SAOR: Authoritative Reasoning for the Web

نویسندگان

  • Aidan Hogan
  • Andreas Harth
  • Axel Polleres
چکیده

In this paper we discuss the challenges of performing reasoning on large scale RDF datasets from the Web. We discuss issues and practical solutions relating to reasoning over web data using a rule-based approach to forward-chaining; in particular, we identify the problem of ontology hijacking: new ontologies published on the Web re-defining the semantics of existing concepts resident in other ontologies. Our solution introduces consideration of authoritative sources. Our system is designed to scale, comprising of file-scans and selected lightweight on-disk indices. We evaluate our methods on a dataset in the order of a hundred million statements collected from real-world Web sources.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Scalable Authoritative OWL Reasoning for the Web

In this article the authors discuss the challenges of performing reasoning on large scale RDF datasets from the Web. Using ter-Horst’s pD* fragment of OWL as a base, the authors compose a rulebased framework for application to web data: they argue their decisions using observations of undesirable examples taken directly from the Web. The authors further temper their OWL fragment through conside...

متن کامل

SAOR: Template Rule Optimisations for Distributed Reasoning over 1 Billion Linked Data Triples

In this paper, we discuss optimisations of rule-based materialisation approaches for reasoning over large static RDF datasets. We generalise and reformalise what we call the “partial-indexing” approach to scalable rule-based materialisation: the approach is based on a separation of terminological data, which has been shown in previous and related works to enable highly scalable and distributabl...

متن کامل

Scalable Authoritative OWL Reasoning on a Billion Triples

In this paper we present a scalable algorithm for performing a subset of OWL reasoning over web data using a rule-based approach to forward-chaining; in particular, we identify the problem of ontology hijacking: new ontologies published on the Web re-defining the semantics of existing concepts resident in other ontologies. Our solution introduces consideration of authoritative sources. We prese...

متن کامل

The SILK Language

SILK (Semantic Inferencing for Large Knowledge) is an advanced knowledge representation language combining the latest work in theory, non-monotonic reasoning, business rules, and the Semantic Web. It is designed to be sufficiently expressive and scalable to support large challenges including Project Halo. This evolving document is the authoritative reference on the features, syntax, and semanti...

متن کامل

A novel model of clinical reasoning: Cognitive zipper model

Introduction: Clinical reasoning is a vital aspect of physiciancompetence. It has been the subject of academic research fordecades, and various models of clinical reasoning have beenproposed. The aim of the present study was to develop a theoreticalmodel of clinical reasoning.Methods: To conduct our study, we applied the process of theorysynthesis in accordan...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008